<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/a_digital_camera_designed_for_bloggers_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:39:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-300081</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some of the electronic products like PeoplePC, Spycam, Laser pointer, Webcam, Binocular Camera, etc. are in greater demand now a days and are easily available on the internet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for these useful and worthy informations and I do appreciate the comments which make us aware of the latest chances and updates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With appreciations and regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John Martin&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:39:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-282705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can set the eyefi up for multiple access points, but you need to plug it into the computer for each one. Less than ideal, but uploading loads of pix on random wifi access points is probably not very polite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the camera, I recommend the Canon Powershot S3 IS, which is a bit over your budget (it's $285) but has a great zoom, excellent SLR-like manual modes, and will shoot 640x480x30fps video with 44. kHz stereo audio too. With an eye-fi, it's good for  shot uploading, with an 8zGB card (about $40 these days) you can have an hour of broadcast edit quality video.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-Image-Stabilized-Zoom/dp/B000EMWBV0" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-Image-Stabilized-Zoom/dp/B000EMWBV0"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Canon...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kevinmarks</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-281753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why not just get a better camera phone? Think about it, Scoble uses a Nokia N95 to do all of his QiK streaming and that has a 5 megapixel camera. Jeff Jarvis used a Nokia N82 to cover the World Economic Forum: &lt;a href="http://www.beet.tv/2008/02/nokia-n95-loom.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.beet.tv/2008/02/nokia-n95-loom.html"&gt;http://www.beet.tv/2008/02/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That has a 5 meagpixel camera with xenon flash, wifi and the ability to upload straight to Flickr or whatever image service you like to use. It's the device I currently use day in and day out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Disclosure: I work for Nokia's S60 Division, S60 being the OS that powers devices like the Nokia N95 and N82.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:48:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-281082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Kris Samsung has at least one model -- the G810 I think -- with those features (qwerty, 5 mpx, email, 3g, + wifi). As for the N95, while I don't blog with it, I regularly snap pictures and upload them to flickr with it using the send-to-web feature, with one hand. (The only time I miss not having a qwerty keyboard is typing in URLs.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:31:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280955</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the Eye-Fi card.  Take a picture, relax, camera talks to computer, computer talks to flickr (or any of the other popular services).  Works great.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian D. Johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:22:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm perfectly happy with the email approach. It's two clicks and type the title and click Send. Couldn't be much easier, and I don't want to jailbreak my phone. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Give iFlickr a try on the iphone (u get it in the "installer" after jailbreak) it pushes your pics directly to flickr no need to email.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel H</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:47:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Nokia N95-3 has all of the things on your wishlist.  I love mine!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Eubanks</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:38:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I gave up my iPhone last November I have been live photo blogging from my Treo700p. The camera sux - &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/37bedf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/37bedf"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/37bedf&lt;/a&gt; (guess which one wasn't taken with the treo but uploaded immediately from the sd card).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The N95 is not a solution for this, nor is the SE K850i. With the N95 you can buy a bluetooth keyboard for an extra $120 to get qwerty but good luck snapping a shot and sending that quickly with one hand or sending the message pseudo discretely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The perfect device would be a phone that has a 5mp+ camera with flash, full qwerty keypad, email and evdo, wimax etc. Motorola could resurrect itself with a phone like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kris Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:23:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://eye.fi" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="eye.fi"&gt;eye.fi&lt;/a&gt; doesn't actually help, unless you take all your pictures near the same access point.  (It's amazing that the little 16-bit RISC memory controller chip even has enough CPU to do that :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Concord (a polaroid brand, I think?) made a bluetooth camera in their EyeQ line a few years back, but I don't know if they ever got past 3mp and no optical zoom (ie. "no better than a phonecam".)  Doesn't look like they still make them, either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">_Mark_</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Nokia N82 actually has a 5 megapixel camera, not 3, plus gps and automatic geotagging.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:45:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the Eye-Fi concept for higher quality shots from a real camera.  For mobile / convenience pics, I'm ok with the iPhone, but I hope someone builds an iPhone app that makes submitting to Flickr a little better including automated geo-tagging using the iPhone's location feature.  The ideal camera would include wifi, edge, and gps.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Lazarus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:15:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I paid $499 at tigerdirect for an N95-3.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:02:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm in Canada &amp;amp; don't know what kinds of plans might be available in the US. (Do you have the N95 with North American 3G? Could you just use your iPhone SIM &amp;amp; plan?) Data plans here are outrageously expensive, so typically I'll just use Wifi to upload to Flickr.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:42:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, I have been thinking the same and wondering if I could simply pull the sim from my iPhone and put it in the Nokia to do the upoading....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If that works there are some other more devious options that might work. However I need to sit down and work those out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ekivemark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:03:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with others - the Nokia N95 is probably what you want - but it fails on the $250 at Amazon hurdle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While the N95 8Gb is the top of the line an older N95 might suffice at around $695. You can probably shop around and cut about $100 off that price. Another alternative is to step down from 5 megapixels to around 3 megapixels and go with a $400 Nokia N82&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ekivemark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:01:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280504</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. I was thinking of that approach, since I have an N95, given to me by Nokia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't have a service plan for it though. Any recommendations on the cheapest service plan suitable for picture-taking to Flickr only (ie not planning on using it as a phone, just as a digital camera).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the Nokia N95-3 &amp;amp; -4 do a pretty decent job of this (sending to Flickr and similar sites) when the picture quality is set to medium or high. Not Nikon quality, but certainly a much better camera than the iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:48:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read about eye-fi and it is probably a great work around, but it is incredibly limited.  As far as I can tell you are restricted to the one wifi network you set it up for.  That is fine, but I want to upload from where ever I am.  I also don't want another computer in the middle.  Why can't I just send it off to flickr (or some other photo site) directly since I am already connected to the network.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James King</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought I had found a camera that would do what you are describing when I bought the Nikon Coolpix S51C.  The description that Nikon gives is very misleading.  It will only upload pics to Nikon's myPictureTown website. When you use the e-mail feature it generates an html e-mail instead of just e-mailing the picture, which keeps you from e-mailing it to Flickr. Just thought I'd warn you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:22:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey ever-buddeeee...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looks like Nikon has a bunch of wifi-capable cameras, some of which are well under the $250 pricepoint in the spec.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_e/002-4949301-9725621?url=search-alias%3Delectronics&amp;amp;field-keywords=nikon+wifi&amp;amp;x=0&amp;amp;y=0" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_e/002-4949301-9725621?url=search-alias%3Delectronics&amp;amp;field-keywords=nikon+wifi&amp;amp;x=0&amp;amp;y=0"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/s/ref...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whatcha thing?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:17:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My N95 has a "send to Flickr" built-in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michel Vuijlsteke</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:13:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;again, eye-fi&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:08:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you sure you want this kind of quality camera? IMHO the majority of 'quick pics' can suffice with a low quality cam perhaps improved with some processing power (&lt;a href="http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/viewfinderalignment/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/viewfinderalignment/)"&gt;http://graphics.stanford.ed...&lt;/a&gt;. And the Canon/Nikon/Leica left to the people who appreciate 'slow photography'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrizio</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:07:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A digital camera designed for bloggers? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/29/aDigitalCameraDesignedForB.html#comment-280358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, have you seen this? It's related - &lt;a href="http://twitpic.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitpic.com/"&gt;http://twitpic.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Rubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>