<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/announcing_technewsjunkcom_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:46:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-820796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great idea.  A delicious or technorati tag syntax could help too.  In addition to your notes above, that has been the other issue with techmeme - it is the blog itself that has the juice, not the individual blog post, so we see dull posts from powerful blogs and miss the juicy posts from the rest of the world.  And in this case there are plenty of blogs that don't focus on products but do occasionally have great product posts.  Hard problem to solve but if you're manually reviewing feeds anyways than perhaps encouraging blogs to submit product-oriented posts via a tag syntax that you can parse somewhere would be a starting point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gzino</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-819360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great review on ReadWriteWeb!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/get_great_tech_product_coverage_with_tech_newsjunk.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/get_great_tech_product_coverage_with_tech_newsjunk.php"&gt;http://www.readwriteweb.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-819235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great job Dave. I find both NewsJunk and Tech.NewsJunk very useful. Thanks for sharing them with us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skip&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skipdodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:37:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-818898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a column for tech devices we would LIKE TO SEE&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregorylent</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:07:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-818723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So awesome Dave!  You obviously understand what makes a good mobile news reader, lots of content loaded quick and nicely rendered. Works great on my BB Curve.  One thing that would be even better if the click through to story goes to a mobile friendly rendered version of the article like &lt;a href="http://newsgangbeta.tagregator.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://newsgangbeta.tagregator.com/"&gt;http://newsgangbeta.tagrega...&lt;/a&gt;.  Do that and I'll never visit &lt;a href="http://techmeme.com/mini" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://techmeme.com/mini"&gt;http://techmeme.com/mini&lt;/a&gt; again ;) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Prudente</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-818471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Got it, thanks for the clarification.  One feature I would like is an option to get a feed of the full posts as opposed to just title and snippet.  It would look something like this...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=b18aa9fb0d95e467f0ab2cc288bdf34f&amp;amp;_render=rss" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=b18aa9fb0d95e467f0ab2cc288bdf34f&amp;amp;_render=rss"&gt;http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipe...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's just a rough example that I threw together quickly.  It's missing some of your posts because of the way I hacked it together, but I think you get the idea.  I want to be able to subscribe to Tech NewsJunk in Google Reader and see as much of the article as the source includes in their feed so I don't have to click through each link, but can just scan the full posts in Reader.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looks promising... nice work.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Lazarus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:21:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-818397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;meh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NotDave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:06:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-817975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, on my blog (&lt;a href="http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/)"&gt;http://gravitationalpull.ne...&lt;/a&gt;, about half of the posts are potentially of interest for techjunk, IMHO. Is there a mechanism to ping or message techjunk for posts potentially worth adding to the feed? Or would you take my feed and a human being could add posts of interest? Thanks from all the small-scale bloggers out here in the sticks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ampressman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:21:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-817656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love it!  I love the original newsjunk also.  Great work, Mr. Winer....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Cate</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:38:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-817500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good stuff, Dave. ;)&lt;br&gt;Is there a search for the site too? That would be good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, do we get to know 'who' is choosing/ 'favouring' these stories? (As I see you  mentioned that below)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you want to know about a great product, pre-funding etc - just drop me a line :D hehe. j/k&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cheeers&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kosso</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:26:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-817439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not able to figure it out what special is techjunk offering ? I would prefer &lt;a href="http://techmeme.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="techmeme.com"&gt;techmeme.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://smashingfeeds.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="smashingfeeds.com"&gt;smashingfeeds.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael P</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:47:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-816222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for a great site.  I've started Graphsy on Monday and have no real idea how to promote it or let people know it exists.  I have no funding and no experience with this stuff at all so if posting a link here is inappropriate I'm sorry.  I'd love to get feedback from people using the site, it's graph drawing inside a browser.  You can find it at &lt;a href="http://www.graphsy.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.graphsy.com"&gt;www.graphsy.com&lt;/a&gt; and a blog I stated to track development at &lt;a href="http://blog.graphsy.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="blog.graphsy.com"&gt;blog.graphsy.com&lt;/a&gt;.  Again if this is rude I'm really sorry, any feedback will be greatly appreciated. Hopefully this is something new that you haven't seen before.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maxim Shevertalov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:32:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-815158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much for doing this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobbywhitney</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:27:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-815130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotcha. We may do that. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:19:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-815129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's judgment involved, it's not wisdom of the crowds, a small number of people including myself are reviewing stuff and choosing stories to push out. The articles aren't submitted, we're watching a lot of feeds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:19:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-815123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's an old page -- it was called TechWheat at one point (internally) I should take that page down, the real one, the one that's maintained is here: &lt;a href="http://tech.newsjunk.com/counts.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tech.newsjunk.com/counts.html"&gt;http://tech.newsjunk.com/co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:17:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-815114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the pointer to Louis. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-814928</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you. Better etiquette, if you want to keep track of clicks, would be to follow the example of many other sites and include the target URL, or use Javascript to show the actual URL in the status bar (Google does this). The first method is simpler, though. It could actually be as easy as just adding the target URL as a parameter -- this already works.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;e.g. &lt;a href="http://x.techwheat.com/1H?http://lifehacker.com/397792/five-best-windows-maintenance-tools" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://x.techwheat.com/1H?http://lifehacker.com/397792/five-best-windows-maintenance-tools"&gt;http://x.techwheat.com/1H?h...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then just drop the parameter when you post to Twitter, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calvinNhobbes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:28:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-814850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great initiative Dave. I would definitely add Louis Gray to the ReadWiriteWeb, VentureBeat and Webware list: both because of the relationship he build with the entrepreneurs to try to get fresh information as well as the details he puts in his reviews.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edwin Khodabakchian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:06:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-814723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What is TechWheat? Is that your site too Dave?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really, really, like the looks of &lt;a href="http://techwheat.com/counts.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://techwheat.com/counts.html"&gt;http://techwheat.com/counts...&lt;/a&gt; .  I don't know what that screen is, but I like it better than PopURLs actually.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ken Hudak</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-814714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there an OPML list of feeds that it is based on?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yakov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:37:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-814660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you explain a little more about how the stories are selected?  Is this a list of articles that you personally find interesting?  Is it based on some sort of wisdom of crowds? Are they articles that people submit to you?  I like to have a sense of the editorial process for the news sites I use.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Lazarus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:25:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-814626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm... I guess that the domain is in the square brackets, e.g., [LifeHacker].  I guess it's just my common, peculiar way of browsing where I always look at the URL in my browser's status bar before clicking.  I've been bitten by a tinyurl .com that redirected to a "bad place" in the past (not due to the service but, rather, due to the unscrupulous person who posted the link) and suppose I spoke too quickly - but I, for one, would still feel better if I could do that as opposed depending on the redirect via &lt;a href="http://techwheat.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="techwheat.com"&gt;techwheat.com&lt;/a&gt; to always be trustworthy.  Again, maybe I'm being over-paranoid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DrWhitt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:20:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-814566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is nice, Dave!  I have to say, though, that  I'm a little worried^H^H^H^H^H^H^H paranoid about the use of obscured URLs the to source article, e.g., &lt;a href="http://x.techwheat.com/1H" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://x.techwheat.com/1H"&gt;http://x.techwheat.com/1H&lt;/a&gt;.  Having visibility of the actual URL seems safer for folks like me that first look to see that the domain isn't a "bad place" before actually clicking and being rather blindly redirected to the ultimate location.  What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DrWhitt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:10:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Tech.NewsJunk.Com (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/04/announcingTechnewsjunkcom.html#comment-814549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thrilled there is a mobile version; going to add to my links--congrats!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">susan mernit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:07:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>