<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/campaign_conference_call_mp3s_day_2_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:05:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/21/campaignConferenceCallMp3s.html#comment-192142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I strongly suspect that if those calls become easily available to the public, the content will change substantially.  The dry attempt of P.R. trying to spin the media will turn into yet another attempt to throw out sound bites.  But by all means try and get them. The transition period should be very interesting. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kee Hinckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:05:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/21/campaignConferenceCallMp3s.html#comment-190995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sunshine in this area would be very useful. It would make the reporters more accountable and would make it easier to assess their quality as analysts and filters. Being able to point out bandwagon effects, biases, and missed stories could only improve the quality and effectiveness of coverage. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Wolff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:23:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/21/campaignConferenceCallMp3s.html#comment-172194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The calls are really not that interesting. Just a spokesperson telling the media why their candidate is so great, is going to win or did/didn't mean what they said the day before. It's not unlike the spin you hear on TV/radio/web from the surrogates. They do tend to be a bit more data intensive, when appropriate, and they are a bit more "raw" than most on-camera media/campaign interactions. They usually cover a broader range of topics than you'd hear about in the MSM , but, there's not much groundbreaking, game-changing content there.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cortland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:54:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/21/campaignConferenceCallMp3s.html#comment-168666</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the recordings of the conference calls were to be made public then they would be made to be public. You are giving way too much credit to politicians if you think that these calls wouldn't inevitably be self-censored and manipulated by campaign handlers. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">realist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:22:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/21/campaignConferenceCallMp3s.html#comment-167939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The MP3 will only reveal the incompitence of all these politicians...they need the media to filter their ignorance.  The Clinton's have got by on this for years.  Sounds like Obama is on the ball...  I would be willing to bet since Ron Paul's team is the most web-savvy he should have it already since the media doesn't cover shit for him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smurfhouse</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:22:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/21/campaignConferenceCallMp3s.html#comment-167716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If only you could make this happen, it would change the baseline for accountability for politicians (in every democracy in the world ?)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shiva</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/21/campaignConferenceCallMp3s.html#comment-167552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I looked at your website, but I'm not sure about the conference. I haven't been going to many conferences in the last couple of years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder if you might help with this project? I bet some of the radio stations you work with have access to the flow of MP3s that we want access to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:50:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/21/campaignConferenceCallMp3s.html#comment-167523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As we look back on this, the fact that we, the voters, are denied a direct connection to these historic times and are left with only the, sometime agenda filled, interpretations of the media leaves me with a somber feeling of being disconnected.  What you are doing here, Mr. Winer, is a service and if there is anything we all can do to put the heat on all these campaigns, let us know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:44:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Campaign conference call MP3s, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/21/campaignConferenceCallMp3s.html#comment-167467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, sent you an email to your gmail address - want to invite you to speak at a gathering in Minneapolis, Sat June 28. More info at &lt;a href="http://theconclave.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="theconclave.com"&gt;theconclave.com&lt;/a&gt;. Please get in touch. Sorry to use your comments as an email. Best, Dave dave.martin@gmail.com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:32:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>