-
Website
http://www.scripting.com/ -
Original page
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/03/20/chromeVsFirefox.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
eas
55 comments · 4 points
-
AndrewBurton
134 comments · 10 points
-
Michael Markman (Mickeleh)
154 comments · 15 points
-
Rex Hammock
52 comments · 9 points
-
malatmals
81 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Open is in the eye of the beholder. (Scripting News)
1 day ago · 13 comments
-
Store Twitter URLs in earth's oceans? (Scripting News)
3 days ago · 16 comments
-
Why today's Twitter is like Napster in Y2K. (Scripting News)
4 days ago · 15 comments
-
If you wrote the words you own the copyright. (Scripting News)
3 days ago · 7 comments
-
How open standards are created. (Scripting News)
6 days ago · 11 comments
-
Open is in the eye of the beholder. (Scripting News)
I kind of like the Awesome Bar. It makes having to remember or bookmark pages not as critical.
Safari
It's getting better every release and has gradually become my browser of choice.
I can understand why people don't "get" the reason for Chrome, it doesnt seem to offer much more than other browsers and in fact offers much less in some areas. But after using it for several months I find there's very little that I miss from the other browsers.
(I should point out that I test my own web pages with all five major browsers on a daily basis so I haven't really stopped using anything)
I agree that functionally, it's not at the level of Firefox, so I have to use Firefox for a number of the things I do (Evernote, wiki updates). And my home computers are Macs, so I primarily use Firefox at home.
cases I get a list of Google search results, in some cases a web site with
what I was looking for (like the Google *I'm feeling lucky* search
selection).
Thanks for pointing out that Firefox feature. I likely never would have
discovered it otherwise.
I'm curious which browser plug-ins you "can't live without."
I keep a pretty lean browser, myself. The one exception being an interesting toolbar from a startup I'm working with.
I think "the plot" now is developing killer rendering and Javascript engines, then getting out of the way and letting the web drive innovation. Browsers are merely infrastructure at this point. Look at Mozilla Labs and browsers like Flock - they aren't as exciting or innovative as the web is, and aren't able to adapt nearly fast enough. Web browsers are a mature platform, and the days of major browser innovation are behind us (until someone comes along and completely changes the game, of course).
I like that people at Mozilla are trying to push the user experience forward, but I'd rather they focus on getting the basics right first.
pc general surfing: chrome (as mentioned one box for search/navigate), a right click paste and go eliminating the need for "Enter" after a paste. I find the tabs easier to use.
ff: getting web dev done or banning pesky google ads - not likely to see that in chrome :)
http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/2009/03/bla...
As for user facing features what sort of things are you thinking of? What do you think would make things more fun and empowering?
I think that Mozilla is doing the right thing: trying to offer the best implementation of those standards and over an open and flexible platform where people can experiment with the next wave of those standards.
The result is that IE, Safari and Chrome are now all forced to go that direction (bye bye flex, silverlight, cocoa and other proprietary framework). Web developers win and ultimately the user wins through better apps.
As for the "great new feature" I do think the address bar's dual functionality as Google search is pretty nifty and efficient, though I'm sure it's more about Google's continued dominance of search marketshare than anything else.
I get the impression that the Firefox codebase *has* bloated, and there is some recognition (including within Mozilla) that they need to shrink the underlying browser to a smaller core / virtual machine; and to script more of the everything else in standard Javascript.
At a recent talk in London, the Bespin guys pointed out that they wrote their own text-editor using a Canvas rather than try to rely on Firefox's own text rendering components. And there seems to be a will to make things like Bespin and Ubiquity independent of Firefox, and able to run on Chrome, Safari or even IE.
Of course, Mozilla have some history to overcome ... there are still "legacy" Firefox plugins that need to be supported but there definitely seem to be people there who are thinking hard about the future beyond the monolithic browsers we have today.
If all Chrome manages to do when it comes to the Mac is keep one page from bogging down other's and improve overall responsiveness, then I'll be really happy. That it and Safari have already turned the browser market into a four horse race again is gravy. It clears the way for web developers to do something fun and empowering.
btw: What do you think of the latest version of Safari?
- Session Restore; granted, if the browser doesn't crash, why would the session need to restored, except if the OS crashed.
- The Awesomebar
- Search within a page (and "clicking" found links without using the mouse)
- Extensions. (I might be biased because I work on Elasticfox)
I mostly use a Mac and I must admit, I am tempted to switch to Safari 4.
http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2009/03/ch...
Firefox is slow, crashy and leaky.
Two other features I like about Chrome is the dockabilty of the tabs and the ability to turn a web page in something a bit like a desktop app.
Firefox used to be my favourite browser, now the 10 seconds load time and general sluggishness annoys the hell out of me every time I boot it up.
But I only use it to get an extra LogMeIn session going and to run Google docs saved as application shortcuts.
Reason: I need my Firefox add-ons to create a pleasing tool. Current set includes: Adblock Plus, Colorful Tabs, EditCSS, Firebug, GMarks, Googlebar, IE Tab, New Tab Button on Tab Right, Speed Dial, Split Browser, UnMHT, and Web Developer. Each provides functionality I would not want to surf without.
Compared to my add-ons-equipped Firefox, Safari and Chrome feel like tricycles next to a space shuttle.
-- stan
and while the speech before pales in irrelevance compared to that of Martin Luther King Jr, it is what I'm hoping for.
I dream that you won't notice any browser in the future, because they all render the content the same way.
I dream that Moore's law makes the rendering speed and JavaScript execution speed irrelevant, because our eye's can't perceive a noticeable difference.
I dream that the EU wouldn't care whether Microsoft bundles IE with Windows or not because I'm tired of hearing about it and who cares what browser they're using.
I dream that web applications can be developed to a standard and that people just ignore browsers that don't render properly.
I dream that no one cares about sandboxes, because the underlying security is strong.
I dream that no one cares about sandboxes, because the average user is smart enough to avoid danger.
So yes ... I think the ambiguity of the web browser is a good thing, but agree that, for now, I can't live without my Firefox plugins (primarily for web development).
One of my favorites - Shortcut preferences allow things like "g some search criteria"
to do a google search - or "imdb Jon Favreau" to look for the artist in the imdb
I wonder which Firefox add-ons you can't live without.
8)
You speak of stability and there is a feature FF has to take from Chrome and it is Tab isolation. So each tab can be killed individually when they don't behave, while you have to kill FF when only one tab is freezing up.
With Safari and Firefox we have a nice start to face IE and Chrome is a nice addition. I'm not preaching for the disappearance of IE, I just think good competition will force MS to make a better browser and keep working on it. We saw what MS did when they were the only game in town.
Of course, that's my only Windows machine. I'm otherwise a Mac user, with an iMac 24" and a Powerbook Titanium. (Or Linux in the case of my DVR.)
My take on how to move forward - it's on the longish side, skip towards the end ;)
http://blog.marklowne.com/post/87006028/the-dim...
I remember http://flock.com/about had a good run for a while. Must have a look at it again. Open in various flavours ~ http://flock.com/versions
Stylish
NoScript
Is google Chrome innovation or emulation?
http://www.techunits.com/content/2026/is_google...
i just visited my typical site, www.forbes.com . using chrome, i realized that firefox has spoiled me, i never realized how these sites are a nightmare to the senses with all of the annoying adds.
i just uninstalled chrome. but, i would be happy to switch once adblock, flash block and etc. add-ons are available for chrome.
Also best for porn searcher (LOL) because its security is like IE but faster.
But after Google launches chrome, Firefox's popularity collides.
We all know that Google is the most popular web search engine and the fastest as well.
Although it lacks of security for minor ages and internet newbies.
But because of its incredible speed, people tend to shift over to it.
So when we compare the two internet browsers, it's just a matter of speed vs. security.
For speed, it definitely is Chrome. Although Firefox is 3rd in speedy browsers, there is still a noticeable gap.
For security, go for Firefox. Its security is comparable to IE, which is known for stylish and secured connections.
It also has a block list which gives warning to suspected hack sites.
I use Firefox for browsing, but I think I like chrome for downloading.
However Chrome has some advantages over firefox: opens faster, divides into multiple process to take better throughput from multiple cores. But for me, security is more important at the moment