<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/early_notes_on_googleapps_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:54:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-324483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hi there !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"You are going to see innovation coming from many different places" ! Yes ! and that's a big deal for us too ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jamendo tested the new Google App Engine !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We developped an app from Jamendo ! the game is easy, a chrono start, playing a track from jamendo.. you are connected with a partner and both of you have to tag the track you are listening. when you have 1 or 2 tag in common, you win one point !&lt;br&gt;be the best !!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;feel free to test it, to comment it, it's here :&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://jamendogame.appspot.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jamendogame.appspot.com/"&gt;http://jamendogame.appspot....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cheers&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amelie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:54:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-321015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah this is a VERY BIG DEAL! You are going to see innovation coming from many different places and not just tech. The savvy "civilians" are going to use this platform to transform lots of backwards industries (e.g. law). The Google DNA is spreading and MS is late again and can only respond with "me too." By then, the party is over, mostly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carlos Leyva</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-318181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave... confusing title.. especially as Google has a Google Apps &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/a" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.google.com/a"&gt;www.google.com/a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice article though&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jezarnold</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:19:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-317288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to be constructive, and all OS flamage aside, what about the two Windows boxes is really a dead fucking end?  If you wanted to preserve your development investment in what you now have running on the Windows boxes, what's the barrier between what you have now and where you need to be?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(In the late 1990s, I ran into one company that had huge amounts of code in C++ with MFC, and a well-known Linux/Windows migration guru said, in essence, "you'd have to do a total rewrite" -- but what's the obstacle today?  )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dmarti</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:41:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-317257</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you should put the glass of Google kool-aid down for a sec :P   The limitations on the service are serious, and like you said Amazon has a huge head-start.   Given that Google does some fairly serious datamining already with gmail and other services, I would hope most businesses would be a bit reluctant about placing their data on Google's machines.  I mean, who's customer does a person ultimately become, yours or Google's?   Considering that most of the major acquisitions in the last five years (think skype) have essentially been for the user-base as opposed to the technology, I think you potentially risk devaluing your company by tying it into the Google infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, if you're not happy with your windows hosting, why not move?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Duane Storey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:33:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-316786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Radar, the advantage for google is no assimilation friction. If they see an app taking off (they are monitoring you) then they can turn around and make either job offer to the team or a buyout. That offer will come long before the VC crowd gets hold of them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dave, I am surprised you are surprised about Microsoft. Microsoft has made only 2 right moves in its existence and 2 very bad misses. Faking IBM out of owning the OS and beating Novell in the NOS game were the wins. The losses were not recognizing the Netscape threat and now Saas. [Sorry the Software + Services play they have going won't cut it. Still requires too much investment at the desktop.] So with that track record over a 30 year period I never bet on MS. I've Unix/Linux since the 1990s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johnmc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:37:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-316696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Dave.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see Google Apps as a way to try out a new web site concept, think Digg for example, quick, cheap,  and easy. It only costs money if it becomes popular. As for lock in, that's only a problem if the web site becomes popular, and Google's costs are not competitive. A well funded start-up might be put off by the lock-in issues, but a zillion self-funded concepts  don't care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:18:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-316591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Now Google is taking the black magic out of operating a scalable web app. Python is the new BASIC. "&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would go a step further and say Google is taking the black magic out of Web Apps in general. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:54:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-316072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the biggest benefit is being able to scale up or down quickly without having to over invest in hardware or long term hosting contracts. ie. short term traffic increases or occasional bulk processing&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">garth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:13:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This seems so very much like  dark days of the Microsoft OS monopoly. Who can forget the memories of; stifled competition, and price fixing. In this case Google does the arm twisting AND knuckle cracking by dropping  the pricing of a service to free. Goolge is using the advantage of massive scale built on the backs of consumers and media to choke the life out of them and any competitor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do we now face  a world where all apps are run on the google platform and coded to their specifications. Have we forgotten what happened to Borland, Netscape, and Novel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Make no bones about it; Google is trying to be the next OS at any cost. If they go on this path unchallenged we will see the snuffing out of a vibrant industry that was once the home of rebels that believed in the possibilities and the freedom of choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is also clear that Google is the biggest danger to Open Source software that we have ever seen.&lt;br&gt;Where is the cloud/OS for those of us that want a choice and don't think its a good idea for one company to own the very life of the internet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We at &lt;a href="http://adelph.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="adelph.us"&gt;adelph.us&lt;/a&gt; will be launching an alternative&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"You take the red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. Remember -- all I am offering is the truth, nothing more."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;from the Matrix written by Andy Wachowski &amp;amp; Larry Wachowski&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">william</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:46:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314773</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had hoped, when making the bet, to be transported into the future by Microsoft's self-interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not sure in what way you think this is the same situation. Google is like Microsoft, a platform vendor, that could, if they're not smart, drive their own platform down a path that isn't lucrative.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it's more likely that Google will shed key pieces of their platform into open source to give developers more incentive to invest. I've been listening to them and watching them, and have formed this opinion, but it's just an opinion. It could be wrong. But I will continue to watch, and gauge my own investment accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've already made a very substantial investment in Amazon and I don't plan to abandon that. It has the advantage of working with my software (the OPML Editor) where Google's does not and unless they radically change it, can't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is what we developers love - a two-party system with two very real very serious players with different approaches. There's room a few more, but the more compatibility the better for everyone, imho.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe this is the beginning of tomorrow's piece. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You talk about being pissed at Microsoft because, having made a bet in the 90s, you're now stuck with two Windows boxes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is this not the same situation?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:44:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a perception probklem with some of the new technologies, probably due to my enterprise (i.e monolitic, centrally managed / administered) background;&lt;br&gt;However, Shane has a valid point - while you can take an AWS instance and (relatively) easily dump it on any x86 archetechture, it's the current model - hosting 2.0, if you like.&lt;br&gt;GAE is a revolutionary disconnect from this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">martin_english</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:36:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am principal at mid size eCommerce business and just can't get what the fuss about..isn't the development cost far outweighs hosting cost?  how many people have need of youtube kind of storage/bandwidth..our server machines don't cost that much ..so does the cost at one of the well known ad networks we work with.. i am curious to know who is the targeted customer base and what's the ROI..unless you crawl a lot of useless data or don't know how proxies and caching works there should not be any need of such thing for any meaningful business..but may be i don't know..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">confused..</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:06:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314568</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thoughtful post, Mr. Winer. You are spot on about "shrinkwrap net apps that scale ... civilians". But, that's going to take some time coming. I can't help think, though, that there is another (un)intended consequence of App Engine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, there are a set of people today who don't have to deal with a learning curve in order to get the most out of this service - and they happen to work inside Google!! With everything going on wrt the GOOG stock price, vesting of old-timers etc, a bunch of programmers could leave and start companies building new and great apps without skipping a beat. It would, in fact, be a head start.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And, as you rightly observe, the 'hits' among these could then be acquired back by Google, and push-button integrated. Could actually be a scenario that Google wouldn't be averse to, methinks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Radnar Birzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:36:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try to imagine asking that question in August 1981 when IBM announced its first PC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There had been a market for personal computers for about five years, and some leaders had emerged, Radio Shack, Commodore, Atari, Apple, a variety of manufacturers making CP/M machines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What would that have meant for you?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, a bunch of things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Now that Apple has competition they may work harder to get a new computer out that is even easier to use (three years later the first Mac would ship).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. A bunch of nerds that hadn't wanted to try the messy world of personal computers would see it as a moment to jump, so there would be a larger market for packaged software.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. A bunch of those nerds that jumped will learn how to program (actually they'll all learn how to program cause you have to to use IBM's first PC) and will make new kinds of software that only makes sense in the new commercial PC environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. You might be ready to buy a computer in say four or five years after that, and yes you would deploy the equivalent of a net app. Imho it won't be any harder to install a net app than it was to install Word or 1-2-3 in 1987 or 1988.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But on the other hand, geeks have work to do Francine, and not everything we do has to make sense to everyone else for it to have value. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, so you finally answered the question I asked on Twitter this AM -- what does this mean to ME? I guess I will be able to deploy net apps. Huh? No, what it really means to me is that net apps will get better, because there won't be so many barriers to entry for young, innovative developers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">francine hardaway</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:07:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has already responded to the cloud computing market with SQL Server Data Service (SSDS) "a highly scalable and cost-effective on-demand data storage and query processing web service". I've been creating small web applications in 100% JavaScript which require no web server infrastructure. They get their data from public web services but I don't need to provide any resources for them. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert S. Robbins</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:39:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-314026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, Dave. I felt exactly the same thing - this is  the IBM PC Moment for the industry ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sridhar Vembu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:32:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-313978</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been deep in Python &amp;amp; Django for the last 2 months, rewriting an ecommerce site from a Perl codebase that's been developed over 7 years. We have it almost ready to ship, and it's been a hoot. I was skeptical about Python, but it didn't take me long to start using the idioms, like List Comprehension, and the switch from PHP and then Ruby was pretty easy to make. The Django world is pretty excited, and anything that makes me a bit more employable is good news. Looking forward to digging into the SDK, but since it's Django, I already know a bunch of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smichel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:13:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-313737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My coworkers and I were just discussing your point on Windows in regards to this notice as well.  I run the technical operations for a popular Windows hosting firm and we were all saying how disappointed we were that Microsoft hasn't built a lot of the features in Virtuozzo and other virtualization layers into the OS itself.  At the same time, we're very thankful that nobody (Amazon or Google) has an offering that could really take over our niche in the marker place...yet.  I have a feeling it's just a matter of time though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William Platnick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-313688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am also reserving judgement for a while.  What has me concerned at this point is lock-in.  At least with Amazon EC2, I can move my code to any linux installation.  This is whether or not I move to another cloud or my own servers.   I realize you will always have custom scripts to integrate with the EC2 environment and plumbing to S3.  However, I think you are very deeply tieing yourself to Google with their offering.  This is an early opinion and time will tell.  I am very happy they have offered it, and I look forward to watching for a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JT Perry</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-313675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find it hard to believe that Amazon is unaware of any potential changes to their artifact sales business; kindle? MP3 downloads w/o DRM or  OS preferences. Don't give Amazon a knockout count, yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">n8k99</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-313565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That was the major point I made in my second piece in this thread.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/30/whyWouldGoogleWebServicesC.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/30/whyWouldGoogleWebServicesC.html"&gt;http://www.scripting.com/st...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:07:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early notes on GoogleApps (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/08/earlyNotesOnGoogleapps.html#comment-313524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be nice if there was a link to app engine in the blog post... please...&lt;br&gt;but a great book to get started with python is this: &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Python-Essential-Reference-Developers-Library/dp/0672328623/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1207687713&amp;amp;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/Python-Essential-Reference-Developers-Library/dp/0672328623/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1207687713&amp;amp;sr=1-1"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Pytho...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beazley's book Python an Essential Reference has an initial chapter that gives you all the basics to dig and code.  If you know how to program, do the simple examples in that first chapter and you'll be a python programmer.    It covers all of the basics.  In the first edition it's about 10 pages or so.  It's a bit longer now.  The rest of the book is more detailed information and libraries.   it is the best programming book I've ever encountered to get started.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the only thing  I though was comparable was learning frontier in an evening.  the docs to do that back in the day were just great.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:56:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>