-
Website
http://www.scripting.com/ -
Original page
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/11/02/howGoogleGotLeftBehind.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
eas
55 comments · 4 points
-
AndrewBurton
134 comments · 10 points
-
Michael Markman (Mickeleh)
154 comments · 15 points
-
Rex Hammock
52 comments · 9 points
-
malatmals
81 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Open is in the eye of the beholder. (Scripting News)
1 day ago · 13 comments
-
Store Twitter URLs in earth's oceans? (Scripting News)
3 days ago · 16 comments
-
Why today's Twitter is like Napster in Y2K. (Scripting News)
4 days ago · 15 comments
-
If you wrote the words you own the copyright. (Scripting News)
3 days ago · 7 comments
-
How open standards are created. (Scripting News)
6 days ago · 11 comments
-
Open is in the eye of the beholder. (Scripting News)
http://www.google.com/search?tbo=1&tbs=qdr:h&q=...
That should include results for [dave winer] over the past hour. Play with the options on the left. You can restrict to all sorts of time intervals.
And here's a search for your name, sorted by date:
http://www.google.com/search?q=dave%20winer&hl=...
Cheers,
-DeWitt
As it turns out, it's easier to get date-sorted information in other types of Google searches. For example, to get http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&i... I merely had to go to Google Blog Search, type in "Dave Winer," and click on "Sort By Date."
If Google would offer a "Sort By Date" function on its MAIN search page, then perhaps the competition would be stopped dead in its tracks.
And I've always wondered why Google doesn't have a Sort By Date option for search. You've just shown why.
Just as well, because while it was whirrrrring, I went and did a likewise vanity search.
Wow, did the results suck! Google is full of FAIL when it comes to Real-Time.
Out of curiosity, what results did you expect to see, vs. what you did see? I'll take the feedback back with me.
Grafting a timeline onto the Google search engine is going to leave you
unsatisfied.
It's like grafting a word prcessor onto a spreadsheet. Lotus tried that, bet
the company on it, and spent years realizing that it wasn't working.
This is a perfect case study for the Innovator's Dilemma.
There's a discussion to be had on relevance vs. timeliness, but for me, it's entirely dependent on the topic I'm searching for. Looking for general information on something, I'll likely want relevance to be my primary search criteria. If I'm looking for information on driver compatibility for my external sound card with Snow Leopard, then I want timeliness over Google's perceived relevance. I don't know how you make this more visible though. Maybe a simple slider above the search results? Newer <----> More Relevant
a) submit the search term via my browser toolbar
b) click "Advanced Search"
c) click "Date, usage rights, numeric search and more"
d) choose "past 24 hours" from the date popup
e) click "Advanced Search" submit button.
It was getting tiresome but recently a new 3-step option appeared and I can
a) submit the search term via my browser toolbar
b) click "Show options"
c) click "past 24 hours"
I'm ready for the 1-step version, I will Like it.
How do you knowledgeable gents see search in a decentralized real time system. I mentioned in a post a while back search like status (you'd propagate searches like real time status/feedupdates so they'd be on the same footing).
My long term dream are virtual assistants that keep track of all my favorite topics/streams, monitoring them with a novelty filter crafted by my usage and manual interaction. Novelty filters intersecting with relevancy features is a fun problem :).