-
Website
http://www.scripting.com/ -
Original page
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/23/iWantToDivorceMyIphone.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
eas
55 comments · 4 points
-
AndrewBurton
134 comments · 10 points
-
Michael Markman (Mickeleh)
154 comments · 15 points
-
Rex Hammock
52 comments · 9 points
-
malatmals
81 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Open is in the eye of the beholder. (Scripting News)
1 day ago · 13 comments
-
Store Twitter URLs in earth's oceans? (Scripting News)
3 days ago · 16 comments
-
Why today's Twitter is like Napster in Y2K. (Scripting News)
4 days ago · 15 comments
-
If you wrote the words you own the copyright. (Scripting News)
3 days ago · 7 comments
-
How open standards are created. (Scripting News)
6 days ago · 11 comments
-
Open is in the eye of the beholder. (Scripting News)
There has never been an easier way for the independent developer to get his application in front of millions of users.
Are there problems, sure but these can be worked out.
Trying to 'save' our 'brother and sister programmers' by not supporting the great applications available for the phone is not the way to do it.
In my opinion. ;-)
It must be there, but I don't see it.
It must be there, but I don't see it.
Very disappointed by Steve Jobs and the whole Apple philosophy. If Apple is proud of their work why won't they compete? It is so strange to see the same phenomenon repeat itself over and over again: little companies proud, brave, independent, and honorable (do no evil) becoming hulking insensitive companies with amnesia about what they hated about the previous behemoths. When I try to reason with folks at the Apple Store I feel as though I am speaking to people who have drunk some very powerful Kool-Aid. (Their eyes are scary pinwheels like Mr. Toad's eyes in the 1949 Disney animated version of The Wind in the Willows.) It is frustrating and EXHAUSTING to try to be a responsible consumer in a stock-holder-profits-uber-alles world.
Katherine
http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom...
BTW, love your comment below, "To everyone who says "Android -- Dave, you'll love Android" -- I feel almost the same about Google as I do about Apple. I read the article about this Sidebar Wiki thing and their product manager said it was just like blogging. I suppose if you have no soul it's just like blogging." Very nice. Reminds me of the "old" days. At least of my "old" days at my first job working for Dan Lynch who oversaw all the main frames at SRI. Lots of people trying to invent amazing things to improve peoples' lives not make a million dollars and/or please a million shareholders.
BTW, several phones have complete enough Bluetooth stacks that they can do tethering, amongst them Sony Ericsson and Nokia, and I've seen reports of people easily making it work with Samsung and LG phones, too. It can be a bit of process to setup all the software pieces (I do it from a Linux laptop), but once configured, it Just Works.
Why don't you take a look at Nokia phones (E63, E71, etc), Android phones (HTC Dream, etc) or the Palm Pre ?
Regards,
Sam
Free yourself Dave.
there are also a ton of new Android based phones coming out in a few months as well.
http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2009/09/love_t...
The N900 will be what the N97 wanted to be.
The only thing I don't like is the speed. The processor used is a bit slow for some applications. The new software (V12) made it a faster, but it still is a shame Nokia decided to use this processor. That being said, I don't think the relatively slow processor would make the phone worthless. It would have been a better great smartphone when a more powerful processor had been used, that's all.
BTW. I also like the built-in FM transmitter.
For me, tethering was a big deal. In fact, Dave specifically mentioned tethering as an important feature. For whatever reason, tmobile seems much less concerned about rooting than AT&T/Apple is with the iPhone. Apple has dropped legal threats in the press about jailbreaking. Maybe Dave doesn't want to "go there" with the iPhone.
Obviously rooting isn't for most people, but it enabled an important feature for me, and may be of interest to Dave.
The OS Rocks, all boundarys come from the carrier, so if you just buy it free, you can do with it, whatever you want.
Since your Cantacts are in gmail allready, you'll never have to sync again...
Android ist absolutely underestimated, because all Bloggers are Apple Fanboys! None of them ever talks about the ugly Itunes! When they test Android, they never install any cool apps, that's why they think android sucks (that and the G1 device).
With Widgets and all, The UI is as sexy and quite more usefull (background apps!!!) than apples eye candy. The devices are unfortunately not that sexy yet ( Since you're Dave Winer, it should be possible for you to get one of those nice "still to come" Android phones...!?) just get an Android Phone, there are millions of reasons... I'll stop fanboy mode now.
And yes I agree the gmail contacts and calendar instant push sync ROCKS on the iPhone. I suspect similar for the CLIQ
The integration with Google services is really cool (contacts sync and there is nothing to set up!) but it can be a lot of dependance on Google and it's scary to think about sometimes.
In terms of contacts, look at the sync Google now provides to sync with them.
As a former palm owner, former windows mobile user, and now jailbroken unlocked iphone owner as well as blackberry owner, I can tell you that no phone is perfect. Even Android and the Pre have their limitations. Your requirements (except for the contact sync) should be met by the vast majority of phones, even the not so mart kind :)
TNL
Another thing I love is the Internet access on Virgin America -- this comment is coming to you from 35,000 feet somewhere above Nevada.
Its a 1) Phone and 2) built for mobile Internet and 3) can tether and connect with any other device (havent tried MiFi).. But point 4) is the best - It is OPEN. Its being built on Maemo platform which is totally open. And also Maemo 5 is sexy (5).
The idea I like best is keeping the iPhone hardware and jailbreaking
it, and joining a pirate community of developers. That sounds like a
plan I could go for.
This is a new platform Nokia is betting on - the Maemo platform not Symbian. Secondly its open. Great hardware - yuo cant fault Nokia with hardware quality - maybe you could with the old Symbian software.
Of course its not yet a tried and tested platform (except on the older Nokia tablets N810 etc)
I just took a look at Cydia, and it looks like it might be neat once they finish it, but right now the app listings don't even tell me what the apps do, so I think I'd probably just write my own jailbreaked iphone apps. It is a great idea: A third party app store with installable third party app store software and commercially supported jail break software is definitely something I can see as having a BIG future, if Apple doesn't crush it. I'm no lawyer, but I actually think that a well-financed vendor in this space might actually have a leg or two to stand on if Apple tried to lock them out or kill them. Anyone know better than I do, perhaps? It is truly a potentially billion dollar idea.
Plus it does not have built-in Wifi - which is a bummer these days when you want to get online on a flash - with the Zaurus you need to stick in the CF wireless card and then get online - not too convenient for someone coming from the IPhone world.
Frankly the Zaurus is old hardware - as a newer OPEN device, the N900 with Maemo 5 seems very attractive.
And the best thing is that the Maemo 6 is going to support app compatibility between Maemo and Symbian - so a much bigger world of apps.
To learn morre about Maemo go to http://maemo.nokia.com/maemo/
Thanks!
The only iPhone feature I'm jealous of is the oleophobic coating on the 3GS's screen.
If you are a CMDA user, I'd start by looking at the Palm Pre. Really nice looking UI. I think the WebOS will have some legs. If the Pre doesn't do it for you, the various Android phones are probably next in line.
I switched from an iPhone to a BB two weeks ago and love it. What I love the most is that the blackberry doesn't force itself to have features that look good in commercials. Examples: iPhone touch screen looks great in commercials, sucks when you want to answer a call while driving or dial an number. Also the iPhone doesn't use the mobile versions of sites, which looks great in commercials but sucks when your data connection is slow.
I like that not only do my blackberry contacts and calendar get auto-synced to google, but that my email and RSS feeds get pushed to the device. Some weather programs can push severe weather alerts to the device as well.
It has a lot to offer as an ugly but functional platform.
They also do good tethering because they are unlocked out of the box. JoikuSpot, which has already been mentioned, will turn your Nokia device into a MiFi.
The Ovi Store does not have the selection of apps that the App Store has, but using a Symbian phone means you can just download applications and install them without any mediator.
I can't confirm this because I use T-Mobile, but the unlocked Nokia E71 can supposedly be used with the $15 a month AT&T MediaNet plan for unlimited 3G.
That being said.. John Dvorak and Adam Curry both use the Nokia E71.
Note: I have some of the same concerns about Google that you do, but Android is nice in that, if I want to completely sever the device from Google's apps and even Google's influence, I can do that. In fact, the version of the OS I use on my Android is created by an independent developer. (See cyanogenmod.com)
2. Nokia E71
I have printed 8x10's from my bb camera and they look great!
What is the downside of going with blackberry? The browser is still pretty lame (but it works) and the screen is fairly small.
Sable
edit: I'm surprised that no one else has recommended the blackberry strongly - this is what they are made for. Additionally, they have some app environments, can be installed OTA with no requirement to use the app store...
-- Nokia E71
-- Nokia E63 (great battery life on both)
-- Blackberry Storm.
-- G1 Android developer (I love the slider thingie)
If you decide on what to get, do let us know.
Max Kalehoff
Phone: 646.489.4629
AIM/GoogleTalk/Skype: maxkalehoff
Blog: www.attentionmax.com
After all is said and done I wouldn't look at any phone that hasn't got a capacitive touchscreen with multitouch or no touchscreen at all. You will want to use a web browser and anybody who has ever used an iPhone will want to gauge their eyes out after using any Android device. The MyTouch browser is so bad that usually only the people who have one can stand it :-).
For using a phone with a web browser, there is simply nothing that beats the iPhone. There will be, someday, but for now each and every other company that makes mobile phones uses either a resistive touchscreen, makes literally _fat_ devices that don't fit in your pocket, doesn't support multitouch and/or they stop supporting it after 6 months. I want to get rid of my iPhone, but there's simply nothing that plays in its league usability-wise.
As for jailbreaking the iPhone, I have a 3Gs, and I gather those aren't jail-breakable currently.
So, guess I'll just have to keep waiting for a phone that values me as a customer rather than as a monthly check...
Google, I don't understand what you are doing here. This is how you sour the relationship with developers. Guess who runs these roms? Developers do! These are the people you need to write software for your OS.
Google, why don't you kick the lawyers and strategist weenies to the curb and "get real" with developers. You have a nice opportunity to counter Apple through openness, but this isn't the way to getter done.
Just got a Samsung Galaxy and it seems nice thus far ...
I used my iTouch extensively for music and reading. So I switched to an unlocked iPhone on T-Mobile. I think it's much, much better than the G1 because it's more mature. It also gives me convergence of one less device. If you really want to move, I'd consider an Android device.
HOWEVER, I think that all these companies are self-serving. It's the nature of the beast. apple gets more press here, just like Microsoft in the OS space, and Google in the search space, on the things they do wrong. It's an argument that I think you ought to make with the FCC, ICC, and other regulators. Using an iPhone, and having it be a large market, means that it stands out to politicians. If you complain about a Palm VII device, no one cares, because they have no market share.
Some links to Hero reviews: http://phandroid.com/2009/09/17/sprint-htc-hero...
Early hands-on look at a CLIQ: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2352749,00...
<http://anymobileanytime.sprint.com/?INTCID=CM:A...>
1. Good phone
2. Very good camera (a real one) with GPS tagging - what do you mean by a camera that can communicate?
3. Has bluetooth, and I know my older Sony can bluetooth tether; I would expect this one can, too.
http://mikecane.wordpress.com/2007/08/31/should...