-
Website
http://www.scripting.com/ -
Original page
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/11/ifThePressWillJustDoTheirJ.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
eas
55 comments · 4 points
-
AndrewBurton
134 comments · 10 points
-
Michael Markman (Mickeleh)
154 comments · 16 points
-
Rex Hammock
52 comments · 9 points
-
malatmals
81 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
How I develop formats and protocols. (Scripting News)
1 day ago · 11 comments
-
Open is in the eye of the beholder. (Scripting News)
3 days ago · 13 comments
-
Store Twitter URLs in earth's oceans? (Scripting News)
5 days ago · 16 comments
-
Why today's Twitter is like Napster in Y2K. (Scripting News)
5 days ago · 15 comments
-
If you wrote the words you own the copyright. (Scripting News)
5 days ago · 7 comments
-
How I develop formats and protocols. (Scripting News)
They haven't shown any remorse about engaging in phyrric battles before.
They have to be called on it, denounced and exposed.
Yes the media have work to do, but most importantly people have to stop sticking to their comfortable armchairs watching TV or Youtube bloopers, and do something to improve their world, because it's clear no politician is going to give it to you for free.
No freedom without a fight.
1. Many are not able to really dig into a politician and get to know him or her. I interviewed six in Washington DC and got 30 minutes at most. Hardly enough time to find that person's weaknesses or dig in deeper than just superficial level.
2. The journalists who DO have access (like those in the White House) are worried about losing their spots. They know they have automatic jobs for life if they don't get kicked out of there.
3. A new administration brings a potential shakeup in press seats, so there's a bit of ass kissing going on, and those who aren't willing to kiss ass aren't going to have reputations that'll get them close.
4. Most of these arguments against Palin are nuanced arguments that require a smart person at both ends (the sending and receiving) and enough time to explain them. That works here on the Web, but not on radio, newspapers, or on TV where the newshole is a few seconds every hour.
5. In the end, this stuff is being fought by the image of her as "one of us." Not me, mind you, because I'm a coastal elitist, but a normal, church-going, average American with a couple of kids who aren't perfect and who take their kids to some sporting event in the afternoons. They aren't going to go into too much depth and, anyway, having someone like Palin in office sure seems like a positive for someone who hates politicians (if you watch my interview with Lessig you'll learn that only 9% view Congress positivitely). An outsider who is different than most politicians will resonate with a large number of people.
Take all of this and I'm not hopeful anymore. I think McCain is winning and going to continue to win on image alone. Welcome to our future. Four more years.
1. Someone is lying to you in an interview.
2. You know for a fact that they are lying.
Then you can't continue the interview. That has to end it.
It's the same kind of rule that governs what a reporter is obligated to do when given something on background. If it turns out that what was given to you in confidence was a lie, your obligation to keep it confidential goes away and you even have an obligation to then disclose the whole thing, because you have been used to spread a lie, which is the the oppostite of the job of a reporter.
Keeping access is not an excuse. Sorry. Anymore that you can justify perjury by a financial consideration. The only thing a reporter has to do is report the facts. If the reporter is reporting lies, you're not a reporter, you have lost your integrity.
However it's true that it's hard sometimes to know that someone is lying but sometimes it's not hard. If someone tells you that Barack Obama is a sexual pervert and wrote a law that forces kids to learn about sex before they learn to read, come on, that's a lie -- right?
This isn't theoretical, I'm talking about current events.
But anyway, I'm keeping up with the news. That's why I'm depressed and why I am not nearly as confident as you are. I still remember Bill Clinton's advance team telling me that it doesn't matter what the candidates say, it matters how they look.
There is no fourth estate.
The campaign continues.
Calling the republicans on their lies will be great to see, but I fear that will not be the end of anything. I may be wrong by saying these but there are certain news media who appear to be biased when it comes to the election. If reporters try to do their jobs, calling on the lies in interviews what will happen is that these biased news media will be the only one getting any interview time with the candidates. And you know that that is a bad thing as no challenging questions will come on problematic points, and absurd claims made will not always be negated by facts. Also the reporters trying to dig up the truth will be dismissed as left media.
The other problem is that most people are to lazy to do something. Yes some of them may complain, but bottom line they come home from work. They are tired. They have this familiar idea of who should run the country. They wont do much, wont dig for facts.
The Republicans are running a campaign that is low on content and truth and big on lies and sleaze. It is for the republicans to realize that if that is the way to win the election it might not be the best for America for them to win the election. Maybe its time to go to the drawing board and start thinking about what is actually good for the people. I know it probably won't happen but a guy can dream.
It is interesting to see what will be the next ad, can it go even lower?
In fact , at this point, asking the press to do the Dems' work for them (by hectoring the Republicans) is something the Republicans would welcome -- it would bolster their message that the Dems and the Press form part of the establishment.
There's a lot of evidence, much of it supplied by the press themselves, that they'd like it if Obama won. Most voters can sense this, and as a result many will just discount or factor out what the press is saying against the Repubs. This is why I think an evenhanded press is important -- the press has been busy discrediting itself by fawning over Obama.
Anyway, I'm hoping Obama can gloss over distractions like Palin and focus on what he's always done well - boots on the ground. Good organization. Look at this map and you'll figure out where the boots on the ground have to go: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/ob...
Obama can win this easily. Without winning VA and FL. I'll be astonished if he doesn't win NH. Hillary could probably help deliver PA. Even without PA, Obama could easily take MI, IN, OH by going there and repeating a simple message: "All you got after 8 years of Republican rule is a lousy economy. Enough!". That's it, he's won. No need to worry about VA and FL.
Seriously, this is how Obama will win. Not by playing the same old media "gotcha" game, but by organising and reaching out to key voters better.
However, as you hinted at, most Americans are not educated and don't really care about the future of this country. And even after watching this interview I'd be surprised if most of the people were as shocked as you and I are. I'm sure the majority of the country doesn't know what the Bush Doctrine is, and has no experience with foreign policy, or any interest in foreign policy, so I don't think even something like this will affect their vote.
I wish and hope that you are right about this being the end of the Republican campaign, but I fear you are not.
http://whatbillthinks.blogspot.com/2008/09/dave...
John McCain has a 'press whistle'. It's like a dog whistle, but only the main stream media can hear it.
He gives his 'press whistle' a toot and claims "lipstick on a pig is sexist!" and the media runs with it. After he blows it anything he says, no matter how factually fractured, no matter how irrelevant., becomes the story of the day.
Sources tell me it sounds like a missing blond woman.
1. I truly believe that McCain is not as far right as he is now running. Even the "Republican Base" fervently believed this until a few weeks ago.
Will the "maverick" in him really stick to far-right principles if he were to get in office? I have my doubts.
And if I have doubts, and I'm not a Republican, how hard would it be to rekindle the doubts of the Republican Base.
To Obama: Go after his strengths.
2. Some time ago, Obama said that he would think about sending troops (or special ops) into the Tribal regions of Pakistan. He was slammed at the time.
Guess what the Republican administration did this summer -- authorized just such action. And now they're happening.
Just as Bush's withdrawal plans are looking more and more like Obama's, Obama's ideas about these wars are proving correct.
These are important ideas that Obama was out in front of and he needs to figure out how to get credit.
3. Obama needs to swallow his pride and stop pronouncing it as "Pahk-ee-stahn."