<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in Monday morning stuffff (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/monday_morning_stuffff_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:23:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Monday morning stuffff (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/14/mondayMorningStuffff.html#comment-16618009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think the analogy of gif and jpeg is accurate. A better comparison would be with HTTP. Imagine if we had two competing standards for HTTP. Would that be a good thing for users?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:23:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Monday morning stuffff (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/14/mondayMorningStuffff.html#comment-16605388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree, Dave, as I think you know -- RSSCloud and PubSubHubBub are very complimentary technologies with pretty  much the same end goal. Our browsers are better for supporting both .jpg and .gif images, and I think our realtime ecosystem will be better for supporting both of these systems as well. I expect by springtime, there'll be a library for PHP or Python or whatever that abstracts the differences away, anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anil Dash</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:02:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>