<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/new_ui_for_bitly_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:44:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3197532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://goo.gl/2Zd1r4&amp;amp;otur" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://goo.gl/2Zd1r4&amp;amp;otur"&gt;https://goo.gl/2Zd1r4&amp;amp;otur&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trentono</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:44:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3137839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't understand. You've been so supportive of &lt;a href="http://identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="identi.ca"&gt;identi.ca&lt;/a&gt; on your blog, and &lt;a href="http://identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="identi.ca"&gt;identi.ca&lt;/a&gt; has cloned the Twitter API, so supporting it is dead easy. But still &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; only has support for Twitter. Why? &lt;a href="http://tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tr.im"&gt;tr.im&lt;/a&gt; has support for both! Please, please add support for &lt;a href="http://identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="identi.ca"&gt;identi.ca&lt;/a&gt;! Or better yet, support for any Laconica installation!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">forteller</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:25:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3126095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The API was broken for a bit due to an unexpected change along with a change in the URLs for info (switch from info.php to info).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This should have been better communicated prior to change.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3096621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can we get it in Twhirl? I love the tracking, but the bookmarklet and website are one step removed from the tool I and a lot of people use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it also might increase the analytics you get on the back-end if you can get more "long-url-share." However, I am not sure the end-game here so that may not be motivation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New interface brought me back. Good job!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Rice</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:53:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3074121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A great tagline would be "Another place where size matters."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:56:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3072985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree. I'm trying to get better at CSS, but find that tables still continue to work better, especially where IE 6 compatibility is concerned.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bit.ly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:56:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3072828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We'll look into this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bit.ly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3072441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1. definitely, we need to fix that.&lt;br&gt;2. just made the index page compatible with old bookmarklet. Would like to get feedback on each of the new ones if you would like to try them.&lt;br&gt;3. disagree about password confirm--maybe banks need this, but personally think it's old school.&lt;br&gt;4. we need to be clearer on this.&lt;br&gt;5. disqus integration is a good idea&lt;br&gt;6. RSS coming soon! 100% agreeed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kortina</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:25:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3058485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;New version seems to be working fine for me, but the site crashes Opera. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cartwright</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:09:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3055486</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty sloppy mark-up (tables? really?). I was hoping this would be fixed when I saw the new design. UI is an improvement, however.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Golda</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:51:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3055289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Argh.  Never had a problem with &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; before today - now it keeps crashing and crap.  Not happy Jan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agree with #2 - old buttons should have at least worked temporariy and given us opportunity to "upgrade" VERY bad experience there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twitter post is a neat idea.  Rename it Bit.Twit to make sense.  Seems to take forEVER to post to Twitter - I mean who has an extra 20 seconds nowadays.  But it does take a moment, and in that time I've "reposted" 2 or 3 times.  I'm sure Twitter doesn't need more crap being sent to it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Short 'n Url'ys is a much better tag line.  ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tried to use my Bit.Twit bookmark - failed.  Get some vague error screen with no help or option to click on and try again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Overall.  Good attempt.  Could do better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Quinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:32:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3052839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can see where what I wrote might be confusing, and welcome the opportunity to clarify.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Rule #1 says -- No Breakage. (And there's a funny corollary if you happen to work for me, Rule #1a -- Don't Break Dave.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. They did break any user who used the old bookmarklet, which included me. Therefore they violated both rules. (Which is my rule, the guys at &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; might not know it.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:59:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New UI for bit.ly (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/14/newUiForBitly.html#comment-3052757</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't you mean it *doesn't* violate rule #1? If it doesn't break, that's a good thing, unless I missed something.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stoppableforce</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:54:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>