-
Website
http://www.scripting.com/ -
Original page
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/25/palincouricPartIi.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
eas
55 comments · 4 points
-
AndrewBurton
134 comments · 10 points
-
Michael Markman (Mickeleh)
154 comments · 16 points
-
Rex Hammock
52 comments · 9 points
-
malatmals
81 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
How I develop formats and protocols. (Scripting News)
1 day ago · 11 comments
-
Open is in the eye of the beholder. (Scripting News)
3 days ago · 13 comments
-
Store Twitter URLs in earth's oceans? (Scripting News)
5 days ago · 16 comments
-
Why today's Twitter is like Napster in Y2K. (Scripting News)
5 days ago · 15 comments
-
If you wrote the words you own the copyright. (Scripting News)
5 days ago · 7 comments
-
How I develop formats and protocols. (Scripting News)
What truely amazes me is the % of people who think that she is qualified. Talk about party loyalty!!
Anyone who listens to what little is available where Palin is forced to think on her feet and feels that she is VP material (or god forbid, P material) is not being rational.
She is probably a very good person who is far far out of her league.
And it says tons about John McCain.
that is a good one
http://twostorks.com/blog/
Maybe she will end up in a Weezer video
Chapter One
- Form and complete sentence before speaking...
Last night's interview was just as bad. She didn't answer any questions. She only responded in talking points.
At first, I didn't care if McCain or Obama won. Now I cannot bear the thought of the old ex-cancer patient McCain having this as his stand-in.
I've got to admit, though, that after seeing Hillary day after day for the past year being the ultimate flerg, Palin is a welcomed site for sore eyes.
From our side it looks like the stakes cant be any higher for the US or the world !!!!
I have a hard time buying the argument that the "liberal" media treated her unfairly. Katie Couric seemed respectful and asked her the sorts of questions that all candidates get asked, as far as I can see. The sign of a seasoned candidate is someone who can handle difficult questions with aplomb and a ready set of answers.
It seemed clear from the start that this women did not have the credentials to run for VP. The interview depressingly confirms this fact. She cannot string coherent sentences together and comes across as a lightweight - stammering, uncertain - anything but the strong leadership we so desparately need at this time. This problem goes beyond politics - even if I disagree with the views expressed by a politician, I would at least like to feel that the person is learned, wise, and strong. Sarah Palin displays none of these qualities. They say that ultimately no one votes based on the VP candidate. Sarah Palin could end up being an exception to the rule, especially given how it speaks of John McCain's decision-making. I see choosing Sarah Palin as a running mate as an unbelievably cynical/political move that should insult women and the right wing, in general. Was it impossible to find an individual to energize the Republican base who had stronger credentials? If so, we are in a very sorry state of affairs.
and we end up with THIS LOBOTOMIC BIMBO as our so very potential head of state?