<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/the_best_way_to_read_the_ny_times_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:14:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6299931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For me, the River concept just doesn't work for something like the New York Times.  I don't have the time to scan through 50 articles several times a day just to find something I might like, especially given that I read multiple newspaper sites.  That's why the editorial process is important.  I will skim through the headlines and then delve in further to a specific area, like Football.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For feeds where I absolutely need to read or glance at every single item, then absolutely.  But not something as voluminous s the Times. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6293527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This works too, includes everything, including NYT blogs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://facebook.beta.nytimes.com/feeds/nytimes/nytriver.xml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://facebook.beta.nytimes.com/feeds/nytimes/nytriver.xml"&gt;http://facebook.beta.nytime...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick LaForge</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:38:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6266302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Off topic, but if you can't make money off this stimulus plan, you have no business being in business. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:57:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6264794</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Teletypes were big, noisy and unreliable. I once had a job that was dependent on the awful things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More RSS feeds are out there than some of us may notice. Many news outlets have an easy-to-miss link at the bottom of their home page to a full roster of RSS feeds, filtered by category, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The RiverOfNews concept is much like subscribing to a wire service in the old days, if you could afford it, that is.  You'd run over, grab several feet of copy off the printer, and see what was going on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't imagine using the web without RSS.  Thanks, Dave.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">justcorbly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:01:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6264084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay it's *something* like a teletype. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:59:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6264058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If it was a teletype, Dave -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;you wouldn't have to click on anything, just read&lt;br&gt;the teletype would ding when there was a breaking story&lt;br&gt;you could read lots of drafts of a breaking story in progress as they went on the wire&lt;br&gt;there would be periods of inactivity when you could ignore it&lt;br&gt;when there was news, you could hear that there was news by the sound of the teletype&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed Vielmetti</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6263324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Even older than the teletype, it resembles the scroll which predates books. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johan van Rooyen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:04:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6263138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow, great idea and implementation. Like the clean layout and plain black text on white, same as your blog. Very clear and easy to read. Good for grepping too :-) to find specific topics of interest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vasudev Ram</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:50:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6262948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about Kindle2.0  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marshal sandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:37:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6262922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The RSS feeds were new in 2002 -- about 7 years ago. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:34:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6262720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ya, that new API addition looks helpful. &lt;a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=101&amp;amp;aid=158177" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=101&amp;amp;aid=158177"&gt;http://www.poynter.org/colu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">malatmals</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:19:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best way to read the NY Times (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/02/14/theBestWayToReadTheNyTimes.html#comment-6262521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like this a lot!  :-)  Thanks, Dave!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matik72</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>