<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/the_next_step_in_digg_clones_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:48:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-86506509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes, the digg is good. but i not like use it.thank you for the article &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DJ Equipment</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:48:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-13484697</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Didn't Netscape try something like this a few years ago? "Experts" aggregating news or some such. Seems to have gone tits up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alojamentoweb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-683049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.diggtr.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.diggtr.com"&gt;www.diggtr.com&lt;/a&gt; is the place to share your favorites and to communicate with others that share your interests.You are the editor and if your story is popular it will be published on the front page.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gokhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:26:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-46090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Boing-boing, much?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhasper</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:18:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-42413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, thought you would be interested in this news in case you haven't already seen it...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://mashable.com/2007/12/19/pligg-fraxi/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mashable.com/2007/12/19/pligg-fraxi/"&gt;http://mashable.com/2007/12...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pligg, the Digg clone software company, is about to release a service that lets anyone build their own Digg clone without programming skills.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Lazarus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-32393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This makes me smile -- even chuckle. I can imagine Ben Franklin discussing the same thing with the contemporaries of his day. It was called a newspaper back then. Everything old is new again. Best wishes for wonderful success -- I mean that sincerely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jgraziani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-26679</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The next step would be to build a site to allow *multiple* communities to do this.  You, Steve, Om, and Scoble are interesing to some people, but another group would be more interesting to others.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug Hellmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-21902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I built the very thing you're talking about in 1998 for Clear Ink. The site was called The Link Conservatory. At the time I thought of it as a clone of Yahoo where the editors were the employees of our company. You can see captures of it in the Wayback Machine. &lt;a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19991128190844/http://linkconservatory.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://web.archive.org/web/19991128190844/http://linkconservatory.com/"&gt;http://web.archive.org/web/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leon Atkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-21308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree absolutely with this idea. I started Luddity about a month ago as a way of keeping up to date with tech news by using the idea that the group of people I know in the tech community in Ireland all live in different spaces and thus would bring the news that they are interested in and the community could vote on it's relevance etc. I for instance am focused on social networking and online media. Another friend is working with mobile technology. I'm interested in what's going on in that space but can't track everything. This way we all benefit from a community with a certain level of expertise. I reckoned it could work with a communtiy of less than a hundred. Good luck with it anyway as I believe you're on to something. But I thought of it first... LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Mannering</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:13:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20678</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like this idea. I'll be interested to see how it crystallizes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I'm surprised Digg hasn't done anything similar. Seems like they could by opening up their platform a bit more, no? Why aren't they going in this direction?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Burnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:37:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Spot on. Could'nt agree more with the fact that digg is becoming more and more difficult to dig through.  I usually spend more time sieving through articles than reading them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just one point though, arent you talking about a collective link blog of people like yourself, Scoble, Fred Wilson, Steve Rubel, Amyloo, Jim Posner, Lawrence Lee?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ujj</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:52:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I want starting a Digg-like community to be as easy as creating a weblog on &lt;a href="http://blogger.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="blogger.com"&gt;blogger.com&lt;/a&gt;."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's exactly what coRank (&lt;a href="http://www.corank.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.corank.com"&gt;www.corank.com&lt;/a&gt;) does, Dave. The service has been covered all over the place (@ TechCrunch several times, R/W Web, Mashable...). I think you were the only one left! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FCrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:12:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dave, I have been following your blog for quite some time now, and am a very big fan of yours.  I also had a Digg clone in mind and did extensive research on it... I never went ahead with my idea, but if there is anything I can help you with please let me know. I would be more than glad to help (@ no cost :)) &lt;br&gt;shayan [at] &lt;a href="http://dineorwine.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="dineorwine.com"&gt;dineorwine.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shayan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:45:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hey dave, i missed your original post. i'd love to build a community for you -- in fact it's exactly what i've been working on. check out my blog and you'll see what i'm talking about. i'm shooting you an email as well.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kid mercury</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:51:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just did a write up on this very subject today and then found this article. I miss digg. What we have now is the college drunken party version of a once respectable website. I've lost my passion for posting, reading and commenting there. I'd love to see a site that was like it was back then. Something where pertinent information can be found without having to sort through the hundreds of LOLcat pictures and Will it Blend videos. Where I can feel like I am part of a community and not an outsider looking in on a self implosion waiting to happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@salman - No, I'm not really working on this but the site I created -&lt;a href="http://blogrunner.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="blogrunner.com"&gt;blogrunner.com&lt;/a&gt;- uses this concept - its the web remixed and ranked by the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@alexh - digg is mashable but to accomplish what you want you'd have to map digg ids to twitter ids&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philippe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:32:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;We'd count on the judgement of these people to find us interesting news items, and be fair in deciding their relevance.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This sounds very Andrew Keen, or Nick Carr.  And very anti-Web 2.0.  Isn't the idea behind "Wisdom of Crowds" the notion that, as the crowd grows, the wisdom grows with it?  If the opposite is true, that doesn't say very much for this O'Reilly Web 2.0 notion.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JG</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:54:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is one of the reasons we built the Community Solution for Movable Type (See &lt;a href="http://movabletype.com/products/community-solution.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://movabletype.com/products/community-solution.html"&gt;http://movabletype.com/prod...&lt;/a&gt; ), because we were thinking along similar lines -- people need to be able to create small or constrained communities of interest, complete with all the features (voting/rating, profiles, etc.) that people expect from the other social sites they're using.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anil Dash</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:42:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I'm not mistaken, there are no groups in delicious + the ui leaves something to be desired. I use delicious alot myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnþór Snær</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:46:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-20050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Phillipe, I was thinking about the exact same thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How mashable is Digg itself?  Do they provide an API where I could filter out the vote, and only show things that people in my Twitter list have dugg?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AlexH</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:29:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-19963</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Pligg is excellent. It's an open-source (PHP based) system for creating Digg clones. It has a neat optional module that lets you create new articles from RSS feeds, which helps to get a site going when there are not many submissions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I got a site up in about 2 hours, starting from nothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:48:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-19867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's an interesting concept as a way for a small group of individuals to create something that meets their specific individual needs. The question is whether it would have staying power with a small group of supporters/users. The other issue is what happens if this service becomes so good that others start clamoring to be included? Would you keep it small or expand and risk being the victim of your own success. Nevertheless, this is the kind of project that could become more prevalent as people look to create their own personalized versions of online services.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:04:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-19846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Philippe - I think the direction you are pointing towards is exactly right. Further, if we could 'own' (or control) the data around our explicit votes and our implicit attention, and syndicated it, any one could create a micro-digg based on their chosen community... and slide and dice those micro-diggs any way they wanted.  Are you working on anything like this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Salman FF</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:01:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-19783</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, good to see you are still "Digging"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:11:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html#comment-19755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of folks use a very specific tag on delicious to bookmark articles, pages, posts, etc for each other.  Each suggested link is supposed to have a synopsis (in the delicious description) so that it's not necessary to visit the page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We took the delicious rss feed and made it into one big webpage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's a hack, but it works kinda like you are talking about -  no voting, though.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RacerRick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:06:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>