<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/twitter_federates_with_google_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:03:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4523497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, are relationships in social networks always inherently reciprocal? That's one design choice but I think not the only one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For example, at Flickr, people can choose to reciprocate the contact or not, and/or reciprocate the friend or family flag, or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:03:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4424100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Being able to use your Twitter profile as the default profile on Google's Friend Connect is kind of a big deal for Twitter. I can now just update that one profile and any site that's Friend Connected does the right thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Albert Willis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:48:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4424007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because of the way Twitter is openly architected, using microformats to markup who you follow and who follows you, Google could already see any Twitter user's social graph via its Social Graph API: &lt;a href="http://socialgraph-resources.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/samples/findcontacts.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://socialgraph-resources.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/samples/findcontacts.html"&gt;http://socialgraph-resource...&lt;/a&gt;. Type your twitter URL and you'll see Google map your Twitter graph; it knows if the follows are mutual or not. This was possible long before any deal happened between Google and Twitter, thanks to open protocols.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twitter partnering with Google on Friend Connect doesn't give Google anything they already didn't have access to. The important part that's not being talked about is that you can replace your Google profile with your Twitter profile if you wish, making Twitter more of the default profile in the Friend Connect ecosystem. That's cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Albert Willis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:42:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4423429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google to swallow Twitter in 3...2...1...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blazinBSDAgility</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:59:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4418047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;just hope GOOG doesn't try to modify the social/informal elements of twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kelby johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:30:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4417885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hah, yes, I was just alluding to the fact that Google's already let Dodgeball die in limbo. I'll be shocked if they have any concrete plans for Jaiku at all besides "hey, it runs on App Engine now."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">teradome</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:20:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4417584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave's blog said "Twitter-like service" without mentioning Jaiku. Just struck me as sort of odd that he didn't mention it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Berlind</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:02:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4417510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, but what are they doing with it? That's the question.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">teradome</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:59:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4417498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure how Twitter gains here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, Google wins big. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4417423</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google owns Jaiku, right? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Berlind</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4417412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Meh… there's a possibility Twitter is making a bad decision here. I'd be more inclined to think that this is the start of the major changes we'll see as twitter tries to monetize in 2009. &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10112037-2.html?part=rss&amp;amp;subj=news&amp;amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10112037-2.html?part=rss&amp;amp;subj=news&amp;amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20"&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joey Baker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:53:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/15/twitterFederatesWithGoogle.html#comment-4417356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, this is weird.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mager</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:49:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>