<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/twitter_feeds_stray_puppies_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:02:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/28/twitterFeedsStrayPuppies.html#comment-21378000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the info Kevin -- roaming is not turned on on the Sprint, and you&lt;br&gt;need some kind of password to turn it on and I don't have it. I would have&lt;br&gt;been happy to roam into Verizon's service. What does it do if Sprint has&lt;br&gt;some coverage but is just really slow and intermittent. I have a feeling it&lt;br&gt;doesn't roam then. That's what was happening at the hotel. I paid $13 for&lt;br&gt;their Internet access and that was super fast. If I'm going to keep paying&lt;br&gt;for hotel service, why am I paying SPrint $60 a month for this shit service.&lt;br&gt;That's what gets me. Last night at LAX was the ultimate. All these people&lt;br&gt;all around me were online with Verizon or T-Mobile. I'm supposed to be some&lt;br&gt;kind of Internet developer, but I was stuck watching Chinatown (great movie,&lt;br&gt;but I've seen it before).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:02:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/28/twitterFeedsStrayPuppies.html#comment-21265625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;.Hehe! "I swear Verizon EVDO rides on sunbeams". Even though it's not intended to be a positive, taken out of context it's quite a cheery little image. The Verizon marketing guys should pay you a big chunk for that cute marketing slogan!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chuck Shotton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:50:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/28/twitterFeedsStrayPuppies.html#comment-21260811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing but complaints from readers regarding your linkblog?!  That's nuts.  It's great, especially via RSS.  Clean, clean, clean — as is all your stuff, actually.  Love it, even if few links have been of interest so far.  Thanks, Dave!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wilson J Duckfleet</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:46:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/28/twitterFeedsStrayPuppies.html#comment-21250868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hi dave, the feed embedded above (&lt;a href="http://static.lifeliner.org/dave/rss.xml)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://static.lifeliner.org/dave/rss.xml)"&gt;http://static.lifeliner.org...&lt;/a&gt; shows no titles in My Yahoo! but the one (&lt;a href="http://protoblogger.com/feed/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://protoblogger.com/feed/)"&gt;http://protoblogger.com/feed/)&lt;/a&gt; provided in your linkblog works fine as usual. wonder if  the (No Title) in my feed is a bug or some sort of new experiment for readers? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yufen </dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/28/twitterFeedsStrayPuppies.html#comment-21237657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Verizon is better. Get Verizon mifi before your next trip.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobboynton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:46:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/28/twitterFeedsStrayPuppies.html#comment-21233710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry that you're getting so much vitriol for the linkblog.  Personally, I love it. I'm a big fan of reading the links other people find interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your linkblog reminds me why I started reading blogs in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still digging,&lt;br&gt;Michael&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael E. Rubin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:09:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/28/twitterFeedsStrayPuppies.html#comment-21213202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find that the major airports can be a connectivity challenge for my iPhone and Verizon EVDO card, particularly early mornings and around 6:00p.m..   It seems that network demand exceeds supply.  Having said that, both generally work better than I expect while on travel.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Zellmer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/28/twitterFeedsStrayPuppies.html#comment-21200353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is Verizon better? - Well, you can't go by their coverage maps. There are many locations I travel that have absolutely no coverage or signal even though the Verizon people say they do. And, I swear Verizon EVDO rides on sunbeams - If it's bright/sunny there is great, reliable connection. If it's overcast, rainy or snow it all goes to hell in a handbasket, can't get a reliable connection to save my soul.&lt;br&gt;So, as usual with all cell providers, it all depends and is specific to exact locations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pxlated</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:46:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter feeds stray puppies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/28/twitterFeedsStrayPuppies.html#comment-21194080</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Verizon is arguably the best in terms of coverage, although I'm surprised your Sprint MiFi had problems - when there's no Sprint signal, it should roam on Verizon's network. Then again, I had to turn on data roaming with my Sprint Palm Pre to take advantage of that. There was a firmware update for the MiFi's earlier this week (&lt;a href="http://jkontherun.com/2009/10/26/mifi-gets-firmware-upgrade/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jkontherun.com/2009/10/26/mifi-gets-firmware-upgrade/)"&gt;http://jkontherun.com/2009/...&lt;/a&gt; so maybe that's the issue?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regardless, if you're thinking of ditching both devices (iPhone and MiFi), the new Verizon Droid announced today should be on the radar. There are 3G tethering apps (although you may have to root the phone) and Android 2.0 looks stunning in terms of features and UI enhancments. Plus -- not sure if this adds value to you or not -- the new free Google Maps Navigation on Android 2.0 just trumped any other nav system by leveraging real time Google Search, street view and more. My $0.02. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevinCTofel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:48:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>