-
Website
http://www.scripting.com/ -
Original page
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/03/13/whatWillWeCallATwitter.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
eas
55 comments · 4 points
-
AndrewBurton
134 comments · 10 points
-
Michael Markman (Mickeleh)
154 comments · 16 points
-
Rex Hammock
52 comments · 9 points
-
malatmals
81 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
How I develop formats and protocols. (Scripting News)
1 day ago · 11 comments
-
Open is in the eye of the beholder. (Scripting News)
3 days ago · 13 comments
-
Store Twitter URLs in earth's oceans? (Scripting News)
5 days ago · 16 comments
-
Why today's Twitter is like Napster in Y2K. (Scripting News)
5 days ago · 15 comments
-
If you wrote the words you own the copyright. (Scripting News)
5 days ago · 7 comments
-
How I develop formats and protocols. (Scripting News)
Interesting question. How will the nomenclature evolve as the tools and industry evolve?
Blogs are now a very common noun, but "blog" was not a trademark or a company. (Although "blogger" is, as you pointed out in your tweet that preceded this post.)
We don't call browsers "Mozillas" or "Netscapes" but "Kleenex" is kleenex.
I vote for a "twitter" becoming a common noun that represents a system like Twitter (the company) currently offers. (But the company's trademark counsel probably would differ.)
But what do we call ourselves as users of a twitter?
Twitter-ers? Tweeters? Tweeple?
or just twits...?
And the verb is what matters.
I'd suggest something that plays off the concept of "status," again, because the vast majority of users are on Facebook.
How about "to stat"? making the person who does it a "statter? And the individual unit a "stat." And the feed a "statfeed."
To wit: "I statted my location." "She statted her pictures." "He statted a link to his latest post."
And you could have made the same argument before blogs. My time is already filled surfing all the sites that Yahoo finds, I don't have time to visit your personal website.
I am absolutely sure that there is value in "fractional horsepower" twitter-like systems.
But that isn't the subject of this post, I'm asking you to *assume* that there will be at least some. What will they be called?
I already wrote about scoble.smallpicture.com on the feature request list.
And nakedjen.smallpicture.com.
I want to see what you guys do with it.
I bet it'll be crazy! (In a nice way.)
http://code.google.com/p/jaikuengine/
WSM - web short message
Mew-blog?
----------
The name is the same, the function is different for everyone though. For some it's microblogging, others it's mass instant messaging or 50 other things.
That also says any other public, i.e. non-enterprise, service would have a hard time competing - including Google or Yahoo.
But now is the time to set that name in stone forever. Since you're consciously trying to shoot for that, make it count. Will it be a "tweet"? Or a DM? Or just plain "message"? How is it different from what we did with IM? Maybe I just "pinged" you.
It's hard! Trying to come up with something which represents a means to publish multimedia, share multimedia and have 'conversations' through multimedia using any platform (or medium) out there with an api to plug in to (bi-directional if possible).
I suppose it could just be *any* word. Then, if enough people use the service and talk/tweet/blog/etc about it then it becomes *the* word of 'it', whatever 'it' is ;)
sigh. we shall see.....
The only chance to change that would be a word that is already common like "i'll text you" ("I'll sms you" is harder to pronounce) and add something specific. For us "twitter" will never be what birds do again (in the first place). But to replace the word with something that people do would be nice ;-)
Because twitter messages always deal with my peer group and news that could be relevant for them "I peer you" or just ""give me a sec I'm peering" could work - it just changes the you = one, into you = many.
What happens if I were to write a script that takes a blog entry and automatically divides it into ~140 character chunks and push them out at regular intervals?
What if I string together related twitters (or unrelated incoherent ones) and publish the composite as a single entry? Am I back to blogging?
http://twitter.com/spryka
why not call them just 'logs'? it's, like, shorter than 'blogs', and it's accurate, because that's what it actually does.
- hey i logged about davewiner's latest article!!!
- you crazy little logger
- i 'm gonna log my ass off tonight
I don't think we can go with twitter per copyright
In reading Clay Shirky' Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable, just a bit into it and its good
http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers...
I'd like to suggest "octavo messages" based on Shirky, No really, seriously, if you think about it a minute. It sounds great, its short. It has a related interpretation. And, no one knows what the hell it means so its easy to "bend" its meaning to new interpretation. Hell, they'll think your talking about music which is always cool to seem artsy.
From Shirky (which you got to admit is one way cool name too.)
"During the wrenching transition to print, experiments were only revealed in retrospect to be turning points. Aldus Manutius, the Venetian printer and publisher, invented the smaller octavo volume along with italic type. What seemed like a minor change — take a book and shrink it — was in retrospect a key innovation in the democratization of the printed word, as books became cheaper, more portable, and therefore more desirable, expanding the market for all publishers, which heightened the value of literacy still further."
Octavo seems apropo. Its the kind of word that most people don't know what it means (at least I didn't) but they think they do. But, when they look it up they say "Of course, I knew that, it means little"
keep keeping 'em honest
I don't think we can go with twitter per copyright
In reading Clay Shirky' Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable, just a bit into it and its good
http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers...
I'd like to suggest "octavo messages" based on Shirky, No really, seriously, if you think about it a minute. It sounds great, its short. It has a related interpretation. And, no one knows what the hell it means so its easy to "bend" its meaning to new interpretation. Hell, they'll think your talking about music which is always cool to seem artsy.
From Shirky (which you got to admit is one way cool name too.)
"During the wrenching transition to print, experiments were only revealed in retrospect to be turning points. Aldus Manutius, the Venetian printer and publisher, invented the smaller octavo volume along with italic type. What seemed like a minor change — take a book and shrink it — was in retrospect a key innovation in the democratization of the printed word, as books became cheaper, more portable, and therefore more desirable, expanding the market for all publishers, which heightened the value of literacy still further."
Octavo seems apropo. Its the kind of word that most people don't know what it means (at least I didn't) but they think they do. But, when they look it up they say "Of course, I knew that, it means little"
keep keeping 'em honest
"Hold on a sec I need to make a bloop"
or what that be take a bloop ?
A slick twit. Skysend
http://riledup.com