<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scripting News - Latest Comments in What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://scripting.disqus.com/what_woke_me_up_about_the_clintons_scripting_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 18:45:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-3083412601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL.  Just one question.  What are tonight's Power Ball numbers?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Citizenright</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 18:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-103934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, but you'd have to prefer Bill being second in command over someone like Cheney for instance...&lt;br&gt;This is the problem with the Republicans... all their nominees are light-weights... if one of them gets elected... who will really be in control? how much will really  change? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Rocket</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:43:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-102417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave,&lt;br&gt;Obama's comment about "which Clinton" he was running against  is so dead-on as to be frightening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am very concerned that the Dems don't have a platform to speak of and have allowed themselves to be extremely marginalized. The opposite of this would be the ghost of RFK-- a politician I intensely disliked because he was so expedient and hungry for power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thr one candidate I have contributed to and believe in is John Edwards. On the other hand the one person that I'm sorry to see not a candidate is Bob Kerrey who I admire and respect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Excellent post on Hillary by the way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, contrary to what you mnay think about my politics because you know a little of my background, I am a lifelong Dem and have helped in registration drives in Oceanside near Camp Pendleton.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best wishes,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jim Forbes&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jim forbes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:11:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-102174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude, you should seriously take some break from politics. Who do you think will be better than Hillary (if she is the democratic nominee and I also seriously hope she is not)? McCain? Romney? Rudy? Huckabee? Come on, all these guys are war mongers. Ron Paul? He is a racist left, right and center. I would rather fail to do my constitutional duty than vote republican. I seriously suggest that you take a break and go to an island where there is no internet or tv.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Krish</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:03:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-102109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know that Bill's behavior necessarily negates the principle of having a first spouse actively involved in running the government. Then again, I'm not that big a fan of term limits, preferring that voters should have the option of turning the incumbents out when they please (and despairing of the fact that voters rarely do so). &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ontario Emperor</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:33:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-101299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd advise sending your stimulus checks to any political candidate. What a waste of that money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Klark</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:06:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-101275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gosh. Voting in another Republican will cement the Supreme Court with a conservative majority that will demolish personal freedoms, condone state sponsored torture and illegal detention, and roll back reproductive freedoms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Supporting Obama is a great idea, but this is no time for a protest vote.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-100151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree that the Bush/Client Dynasty should be closed but I fear the Parties lack the will to promote anyone else!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WRJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-99948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a very good thing! I was reading your twitter posts a couple of weeks back and was getting a little concerned. :-) The main problem with Hillary, I think, is she wouldn't do very well in the General Election. I have still yet to meet someone in person that supports her.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trevor Manternach</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:24:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-99934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I must have missed something. I know you talking a lot about this issue, but I haven't seen it... is there a video of what he did/said. i've tried youtube but, i really think i must be missing something. thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">james</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:17:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What woke me up about the Clintons (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/24/whatWokeMeUpAboutTheClinto.html#comment-99914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Geez, Dave. As I've said before, you're politics and mine often head out in different directions and then they surprise me when they circle back to end up in a similar place. I voted in the Democratic Primary in Tenn. yesterday (we have early voting) so I could vote for Obama. I've decided that in my lifetime, I will never again vote for a Bush or Clinton.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rex Hammock</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:07:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>